Is a dog catcher who refuses to catch dogs a “dog catcher?”

Is a plumber who refuses to touch a pipe a “plumber?”

Is an electrician who refuses to deal with electricity an “electrician?”

If not, then why is Obama “President?”

Is the job of the dog catcher to get elected and then do as he pleases regardless of whether his wishes are in alignment with his job description?

If not, then how is it the job of President of the United States to get elected and then do exactly as he pleases, regardless of his job description?

The job description for President of the United States is Article II of the United States Constitution. Section 1 of that article lays out the oath of office to which the President must swear before taking office.

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

B. Hussein Obama told us all, during the presidential campaign - before even being elected - that he would NOT faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States by preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States. Upon entering office, he immediately laid out his plan for refusing to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States (in his very inaugural address!) Then he set about doing everything in his power to undermine, deconstruct, and attack the Constitution of the United States.

As such, B. Hussein Obama is NOT serving as President, so how can so many people still insist on calling him “President?”

B. Hussein Obama prattled on endlessly that America needed a “new foundation.” What is wrong with our old foundation? Well, according to B. Hussein,

“[The Warren Court] didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution … the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.”

In other words, B. Hussein finds the Constitution to be “deeply flawed” because it prohibits government tyranny instead of insisting upon it!

“…preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Yeah…

B. Hussein proudly stated just days prior to the 2008 election

“[W]e are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

Then in his victory speech five days later:

“Our Union can be perfected.”

How? Well, by overturning the Constitution entirely and forcing a once free people to do as the central government demands. By “redistributing wealth” instead of allowing people to “be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” (4th Amendment.) By designing society from the top down instead of allowing that “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

George Washington wrote the following:

“We must take human nature as we find it. Perfection falls not to the share of mortals. … whoever would dare to sap the foundation, or overturn the Structure, under whatever specious pretexts he may attempt it, will merit the bitterest execration, and the severest punishment which can be inflicted by his injured Country.”

B. Hussein Obama very clearly does not, and by his own words and writings has never intended to honor his oath of office. How, then can he be called President of the United States? A dog catcher who refuses to catch dogs cannot be known as a dog catcher. A president who refuses to honor his oath of office, sworn on a Bible, cannot be known as President.

Isn’t it time to face reality?